<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser detection is still useful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.karmagination.com/blog/2009/07/31/browser-detection-is-still-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.karmagination.com/blog/2009/07/31/browser-detection-is-still-useful/</link>
	<description>Creation begins with imagination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kean</title>
		<link>http://www.karmagination.com/blog/2009/07/31/browser-detection-is-still-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Kean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karmagination.com/blog/?p=73#comment-12</guid>
		<description>@Kit You are right. Updated my code example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kit You are right. Updated my code example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit S. Goncharov</title>
		<link>http://www.karmagination.com/blog/2009/07/31/browser-detection-is-still-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit S. Goncharov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karmagination.com/blog/?p=73#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Definitely a great approach, particularly if the sniffing is only performance-related.

For the node deletion code example: remember that JavaScript doesn&#039;t have block scope. So declaring and defining the variables within their respective blocks is no different from declaring them all first and then defining them inside the blocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a great approach, particularly if the sniffing is only performance-related.</p>
<p>For the node deletion code example: remember that JavaScript doesn&#8217;t have block scope. So declaring and defining the variables within their respective blocks is no different from declaring them all first and then defining them inside the blocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

